The Method

Baseline, or it didn't happen.

You cannot prove an outcome you never baselined. The phase most transformations rush is the one that makes every later claim of success or failure measurable.

Dakhalfani Boyd · · 6 min read

You cannot close a gap you have not located, and you cannot prove an outcome you never baselined. A transformation that skips the honest baseline is one that has decided to fly without instruments, trusting that motion in roughly the right direction will be enough. It rarely is.

Assess, the first discipline, is where the baseline gets set. It is also the phase most transformations either skip or rush, because assessment slows the rush to action, and action is what feels like progress. That instinct is an expensive mistake.

Without a baseline, you cannot even measure the shortfall

When a transformation falls short without a baseline, no one can say by how much. The promise and the outcome are never placed side by side, because placing them side by side would require a number that was never captured. So the gap goes unexamined, and the organization learns nothing, and the next investment is approved on projections the last several quietly failed to meet.

A baseline is what turns a vague sense that things are better or worse into a fact you can act on. It is the difference between knowing and assuming.

What does not get measured does not get fixed.

Adoption is the number that matters

The most important thing to baseline is behavior. Real adoption dips before it rises, because the new way is harder than the old one until it is practiced. Organizations that expected a smooth rise read this expected dip as failure, lose their nerve, and permit the reversion that kills the change.

With a baseline and honest measurement, you know whether the curve is actually rising or merely supposed to be. You can hold your nerve through the dip because you can see it for what it is. Without one, you are guessing, and guessing is how good changes get abandoned a month before they would have held.

Measure what is true, not what is comfortable

The easy path is to track the comfortable metrics, the ones that show activity. The disciplined path is to measure the uncomfortable one: the share of intended users actually working the new way. Baseline that on day one, and every later claim about the transformation has something real to stand on.

Where this goes

This essay draws on the 5A Framework, the repeatable system BoydNorth uses to close the execution gap between strategy and outcomes.

← All essays in The Compass