The Gap

Resistance debt.

Every change that does not stick teaches the organization that change does not stick. That lesson compounds, and the next transformation inherits the bill.

Dakhalfani Boyd · · 7 min read

Every stalled change teaches the organization something, and the lesson is corrosive. Each visible failure tells the workforce that change does not stick, that the new way is temporary, that the initiative currently being championed will pass like the ones before it. People are not stupid. They learn from experience.

I call the accumulation of that lesson resistance debt. It is the built-up skepticism an organization carries into each new change as a result of every change that failed before it. It does not appear on any balance sheet, and it is entirely real.

How it compounds

Resistance debt compounds, which is what makes it dangerous. The next transformation does not begin from zero. It begins from a deficit. It inherits the skepticism of every failed change before it, and it must spend its early energy not on progress but on overcoming the reasonable expectation that it, too, will fail.

The more transformations an organization has botched, the more debt it carries, and the harder each new effort becomes, which makes failure more likely, which adds to the debt. It is a doom loop, and many organizations are quietly trapped in it without having named it.

The workforce in a high-debt organization is not being unreasonable. It is being empirical.

Skepticism is rational

A workforce that has watched leadership grow excited about changes that did not last has concluded, correctly based on the evidence available to it, that enthusiasm is not a reliable predictor of follow-through. Withholding effort until a change proves durable is, from the inside, a sensible way to avoid wasting energy on something that will be abandoned.

The only way to pay it down

Resistance debt can only be paid down the way it was accumulated: through experience, in reverse. An organization that wants to reduce it has to deliver a change that actually sticks, visibly, and then another, until the workforce begins to revise its expectation.

There is no communications campaign that substitutes for this. You cannot talk an organization out of a belief it learned from watching what you did. You can only act your way out of it, by finally finishing something, and then finishing the next thing, until finishing becomes the new expectation.

Where this goes

This essay draws on the 5A Framework, the repeatable system BoydNorth uses to close the execution gap between strategy and outcomes.

← All essays in The Compass